search

Comments by qjeg63jd

Page 1 of 2 | Next

Posted on May 6 at 11:41 p.m.

OMGZ i made up a word!

anyhow i graduated 2003 so you wouldnt know me.

passive aggressiveness is so cool!

On Recipe for a Gay Baby

Posted on April 25 at 2:04 a.m.

no comma after blogs, dunno how that ended up there

On Recipe for a Gay Baby

Posted on April 25 at 2:04 a.m.

well it gets distracting and detracts from what you are trying to say. ellipses are great for written dialogue, but not stuff like this. it isn't endearing, with all due respect. constructive criticism isn't mean, it is something that helps you develop your writing. if you intend on writing seriously like this, take it in stride. i wasn't trying to insult you, it really does make reading this a more difficult task than it really should be. as an english major i can't tell you how many times i have to sift through ellipses in peoples' writings.

blogs, aren't read aloud, suffice to say, so try to adapt your writing strengths to this type of writing. i know it sounds condescending coming from someone younger than you (fun fact, you were acquaintanced with my brother in hhs, but at that point you were already i think 1-2 years older than him and i 6 years under him in age), but i do actually know what i am talking about. as i am sure you do, in theatre.

as i stated prior, constructive criticism is never ever meant to insult, it is something all writers need to reach their "full potential."

On Recipe for a Gay Baby

Posted on April 25 at 1:50 a.m.

"Lenhart said the band feels that society as a whole has allowed a priests to have an inappropriate relationship with young boys, and they have to bring that point to light because people are so desensitized to everything today."

so they are saying that people are totally cool with priests screwing around with little boys? i cant think of one person who is, minus the priests. desensitized is definitely not the correct word for this sit. maybe ignorant would work better. it isn't that people don't care, they aren't aware. well, actually, yes they are, because this is a tired old topic. it's so old the pope himself is actually addressing it head on, with his talks in boston, etc. i think there may be more pressing issues at hand americans may not be as well informed on...jump on the FLDS train if you need something cathartic.

On Metal with a message

Posted on April 21 at 12:31 a.m.

I think if you chilled out on the ellipses this could reach its full potential.

On Recipe for a Gay Baby

Posted on April 18 at 2:29 a.m.

im glad v24 stopped shitting itself.

i cant tell you how many times ive seen that bart gif back in the days.

On Jasper Blankman's Internet Clinic

Posted on April 7 at 5:13 p.m.

Man, really, you are creepy.

And what exactly is your definition of lackey?

On It's a Simulated World: Part One

Posted on February 19 at 1:12 a.m.

What confuses me is that the first picture shows blue and tan M&Ms alongside each other, when they didn't exist simultaneously. Do you think this is an M&M conspiracy, that they are still making the tans and just hiding them from the public???

On Loss of Tan

Posted on February 19 at 12:20 a.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

On Obama promises change in the Valley

Posted on February 12 at 11:38 p.m.

why doesn't m&m just make bags o tan for these nutjobs?

i think i voted for blue. now i always eat the blue first, out of sole appreciation for blue. or because i have odd organizational skills and like to eat only one color at a time, and blue sometimes happens to be first.

On Loss of Tan

Page 1 of 2 | Next